The Piltdown hoax was a situation
in which someone forged fossils that seemed like they were a lot older than
they actually were and of a different species than the original bones. The fossils were found at a site in Piltdown
in the England in 1912 by geologist Charles Dawson. At that time the fossils
were significant because they suggested that humans developed a large brain
before they walked upright. This discovery caused different effects on the scientific
community because the fossils were thought to be the oldest human fossil
remains. These fossils could be used as evidence of Darwin’s theory.
The biggest
human fault that came into play was self-interest. The scientists involved in
the finding of these fossils were very focused on how the findings benefited
them. Because their focus was on self rather than science, objectivity no
longer was a factor in the evaluation of the fossils. Like the video states,
any evidence that may have disputed one of the scientist’s theory could have
been thrown out. They accepted evidence that supported their theories. Their
lack of objectivity greatly impacts the scientific process because they choose
what lines up with their ideas rather than what is true and proven.
A positive aspect
of the scientific method that was responsible for revealing the skull to be a
fraud was further investigation using more advanced tools. Scientists that were
not involved in the finding of the fossils and therefore more objective, ran
chemical tests that proved that the fossils were not as old as first imagined.
They also looked at the teeth under a microscope which proved that the teeth
were filed down to the size that they were indicating that the fossils may have
been forged.
I don’t think
that it is possible to remove the “human factor” from science to reduce the
chance of errors like this happening again. Everyone has their own agendas and
often hears what they want to hear so to speak. I wouldn’t want to remove the
human factor from science because it is that human factor that leads the way to
new discoveries and innovations based on different scientists’ passions and
biases. I think it is just important to make sure that things are cross-checked
and the scientific method is used properly.
The most
important life lesson to take away from this historical event is to always get
the facts straight. It is important when doing any type of research to cross
check things and make sure that sources are reputable. It is important to not
believe everything that is told to you without proper verification. It is also
important to be skeptical about things in order to make sure that what you’re
accepting as fact truly is factual and not based on opinion or biased research.
You did a good job of explaining the significance of this find, namely that it supported the idea that humans developed larger brain earlier in the evolutionary process. But this was really an issue of supporting Darwin's theory. By this time, Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection was not in question. People were no longer asking "if" organisms (including humans) evolved, but "how" they evolved. You talk about this when you discuss the big-brain theory. No need to back up and apply this to the early, already answered question.
ReplyDeleteIt would have been good to finish the story in your synopsis, however. How long did it take to uncover the hoax? How was it discovered and by whom? Why was this fossil so important to England in particular?
I agree that there were non-scientific reasons why the scientists accepted this find so readily. What about the perpetrators of this hoax? Was the hoax created by accident or intentionally? If it was created intentionally (which seems to be the case with all of the staining and filing), then why was it created in the first place? What human faults are involved here?
Good discussion on the positive aspects of science, both technological and methodological.
I agree with your conclusions regarding the human factor.
Good life lesson.
i agree with you in regards of everyone having their own agenda and people wanting to hear what they feel like hearing or believing because everyone is owner of their own beliefs and actions. Also totally agree with the scientific method used correctly because a good hypothesis will come from a good answer that was proven scientifically correctly and if it wouldn't used correctly how are we going to know the answer to certain important things. good job on the discussion
ReplyDeleteI never really thought about self-interest being a fault. After reading what you had to say about it, it makes sense as to why self-interest was a fault in finding the fossil. Everyone wants their "moment" or "spotlight" in order to feel significant I guess. I agree with you that eliminating the human factor is not possible because at the end of the day, we are all human no matter what. That's something that can never change, and human error will always exist. I also agree with you about letting our mistakes lead to greater discoveries in the future. I like how you said the life lesson to get out of this is to get straight to the facts rather than just listen to what others say. At the end of the day, the truth will always prevail. Great post!
ReplyDelete